History | Log In     View a printable version of the current page.  
Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: SAK-10551
Type: Task Task
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: Bryan Holladay
Reporter: Lynn E. Ward
Votes: 4
Watchers: 1
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
Sakai

Surpress display of widgets and labels associated with unused form types in published wizard and matrix cell/pages

Created: 03-Jul-2007 11:45   Updated: 23-Oct-2008 08:38
Component/s: OSP: Wizards - General, OSP: Wizards - Matrix, OSP: Wizards - Hierarchy, OSP: Wizards - Sequential
Affects Version/s: 2.4.0, 2.4.1
Fix Version/s: 2.5.0

Time Tracking:
Not Specified

Environment: n/a

2.4.x Status: None
2.5.x Status: None
2.6.x Status: None


 Description  « Hide
The underlying principle, don't display objects that are not used in published forms. For example, if the author chooses not to include a reflection form in a given wizard page or matrix cell, the "general feedback" lable and region should not be visible inb the published form. Similarly, if any evaluation form has not been included in the page, the "Submit for Evalution confirmation" button should not appear.

 All   Comments   Work Log   Change History   Subversion Commits      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Bas Toeter - 20-Jul-2007 15:55
I agree with not showing too many labels for options that are not there, but it is also nice to look at a category that is empty, for instance 'feedback' to realize that while feedback was an option, none was given.

So sometimes the labels should be hidden (in the case you describe they should be) and sometimes a label can denote an empty list.

Chris Maurer - 26-Jul-2007 12:22
Sounds like we're getting conflicting opinions here. In order to do this, we need clear direction on when to hide and when to show each thing.

Lynn E. Ward - 26-Jul-2007 15:14
Actually, I don't think Bas and I disagree. What i was suggesting was not to show labels anbd widgets assocaited with a particular form type (reflection, feedback, evaluation), if the author of the page hadn't included that form type in the page. So, if the page doesn't include a review/fedback form, the student wouldn't see the feedback label and region on the page. Similarly, if the page doesn't include an eval form, the student doesn't see the submit button.

I think Bas was saying that if the author included a review form in the page, the stuident should see the review label, even if no reviews had been submitted. I agree with his logic. It's a different situation, because teh author chose to include "review" as an explicit part of the process.

Bryan Holladay - 09-Aug-2007 07:25
r33730
This is one step of a progressive fix. Wizard's main page (runWizardGuidance.jsp) has been changed and is working properly.

Bryan Holladay - 10-Aug-2007 12:22
r33840
Everything is committed and running fine.

Bryan Holladay - 10-Aug-2007 12:25
r33840
Hid headers/buttons when the Admin did not select it as a function of the wizard/matrix.

Bryan Holladay - 10-Aug-2007 12:28
r33841

Added a comment about a session variable (EVALUATION_ITEM)

Lynn E. Ward - 10-Aug-2007 13:44
Hi Brian,

Should I be able to see these changes now on Nightly, or is a restart necessary?

Bryan Holladay - 14-Sep-2007 06:35
r35073

Fixed a default = "false" problem for Oracle

Bryan Holladay - 17-Sep-2007 13:26
r35208
Changed text from "Suppress 'Select Item(s)" to "Suppress Evidence Attachments"

Megan May - 06-Feb-2008 11:59
Tasks for 2.5.0 have been completed. We're nearing the end of the QA cycle and A lot of general regression testing has been going on for the past few months - the changes have likely been reviewed via this method of testing